Kennedy had a short second within the solar as a result of he had two superpowers. One, a well-known father, which enabled him to take in simply sufficient assist on title ID alone to look credible in early polls. Two, he was an irresistible canvas for each journal reporter and opinion columnist in America to undertaking their favourite sizzling take onto.
Do you could have 10,000 phrases of ideas on the function of conspiracy pondering in American politics? Each author does! Do you could have a hilarious riff in regards to the broader Kennedy clan you’ve been throwing out at events? Go publish it! Are you a conservative who desires to argue that either side embrace anti-vaccine cranks? Value a shot! Would you prefer to debate the very idea of debates? Go wild! Do you could have an angle on how the press covers fringe candidates? I’m providing you with one proper now!
The same factor occurred with Donald Trump in 2016, who has a magnet for cable segments and thinkpieces alike. However whereas extra protection of any type pushed GOP voters in the direction of Trump, Democratic voters started working away as quickly as they began studying the very first thing about Kennedy’s marketing campaign. And it’s loads more durable to hold an honest column on his candidacy when his base seems to be like the very same group of right-leaning conspiracy lovers we already learn about.
A Quinnipiac ballot this week discovered Democrats disliked Kennedy by a 2:1 margin, whereas his numbers had been nearly completely reversed with Republicans. And the image seemed even worse in New Hampshire, the place he launched his marketing campaign: A UNH ballot discovered a whopping 69% of Democrats had a unfavorable opinion of him.
As election analyst Jacob Rubashkin famous on Twitter, UNH additionally requested New Hampshire Democrats to name a word they related to Kennedy. The outcomes seemed like this:
It was enjoyable whereas it lasted.